In March 2011 a researcher brought a complaint before the DCSD claiming scientific dishonesty, as the researcher's contribution to the research leading to the article was not acknowledged in the article. In addition the researcher claimed that two authors of the article had failed to disclose a possible conflict of interest.
In October 2010 a group of persons brought a complaint before the DCSD concerning the scent research carried out at a knowledge centre by three researchers.
In October 2011 a researcher submitted a complaint to the DCSD claiming that a former collaborator had committed scientific dishonesty (research misconduct). The case was about the listing of the complainant as author in two congress abstracts.
In November 2010 the rector of a university submitted a complaint to the DCSD claiming that a formerly employed researcher at the university had committed scientific dishonesty (research misconduct). The case concerned the method used in an article for counting number of immunohistochemically stained lymph node cells.
In November 2010 a university, where the defendant had performed the research in question, submitted a complaint to the DCSD claiming that the mice described in the article could not have existed.
In September 2010 and over the course of the following months the complainant submitted a complaint to the DCSD regarding a Danish researcher's co-authorship on an article, which according to the complainant did not include relevant data, and the researcher's misinformation regarding authorship in a number of articles.
In June 2012 a person submitted a complaint to the DCSD regarding the quality of scientific evidence in three reports authored by a Danish researcher.
In April 2012 a person acting on behalf of a company brought a complaint before the DCSD concerning a press release and two statement on television which the complainant claimed was in conflict with an associated article.
In March 2012 an individual submitted a complaint to the DCSD concerning a person's use of the complainant's story in a book.
In February 2010 a group of doctors submitted a complaint to the DCSD claiming that the authors of a scientific article had committed sceintific dishonesty (research misconduct). The case was about the use of cost groups in the health economic analysis in the article
In February 2012 a researcher approached the DCSD claiming to be cleared of charges of scientific dishonesty.
